Library Menu
Translating a research question into an effective search can be a challenge. Particularly today, when we are used to Google, which is very forgiving about the words we use to search, it can be hard to move to library tools, where we have to be a little more strategic in how we craft searches.
Tip #1 - Keep searches simple. Avoid searching with a long question or phrase. Databases tend not to handle this well. Instead, pick out the 2-4 most important words in the topic and construct a search with these. Leave out filler words like "and" "of" "the", etc.
Example: Compare the results for following searches
how are women portrayed negatively in magazines? (Communication and Mass Media Complete)
Tip #2 - Use your first results (bad or good) to brainstorm other words to search with. As I'm sure you know, there are usually many ways to search for the same thing. Use the words included in the titles, abstracts, and subject headings to figure out other words to search instead.
Example: From the Article "Taking it All Off: The Portrayal of Women in Advertising Over the Past Forty Years" I brainstormed the following additional words that I could include in my searches. Look at the article to see where I found them.
stereotypes, gender, femininity, "gender role", "sex roles", sexuality
Tip #3 - Search multiple ways to search more exhaustively, and use Booleans and Wildcards to construct more complex searches. If at first you don't succeed, try, try again! Talk to the patron about how a big part of research is experimenting with how you search so that they know what's going on. Of course, if the search is looking more complex, bring a librarian into the discussion because we have a lot of experience with constructing effective searches.
Booleans and Wildcards are search language tools you can use to make your search more powerful:
| X and Y | Searches for Both | Women AND magazines |
| X or Y | Searches for either | stereotypes OR bias |
| X not Y | Doesn't search for the 2nd word | asian NOT american |
| "quotations" | Searches for a phrase | "media representation" |
| Asterisk* | Searches for multiple endings |
portray* (finds portray, portrays, portrayal, portrayals, portrayed) |
| (Parenthesis) |
Groups words together around a boolean (use mostly with ORs) |
women AND magazines AND (femininity OR stereotypes OR sexuality) |
Examples
women AND magazines AND (femininity OR stereotypes OR sexuality OR "gender roles")
women AND portrayal AND film VS women AND portray* AND film
women's rights media VS "women's rights" media
Tip #4 - Use Subject Headings to bring up articles more focused on the topic
When you do a general keyword search, the database will search for these works wherever they can find them (title, publication, abstract, ie, anywhere in the record or full-text). While under certain circumstances this can be helpful, it can also bring back many less relevant hits that include the keywords in tangential ways. If you find your terms (or related ones) listed as subject headings in more "on topic" articles, consider searching these words just as subject headings to bring back resources that are more focused on these topics.
Tip #5 - Be aware of the hazards of "qualifying" keywords.
Understandably, most researchers are digging into a particular angle of a topic, as they seek to flesh out a thesis. For example:
"How have college sports grown into a big business?"
"What challenges do governments face in combating human trafficking?
"What are the advantages and disadvantages of eating organic foods?"
It can be tempting to want to including these qualifiers in your searches, otherwise the results will come back very broadly. However, be careful with this, because there are usually many different ways to describe this criteria, so if you are only searching with the term the patron brought, you may be limiting what you see and missing other important sources.
So what do you do?
Tactic #1 - Leave out the qualifying words in the search and just search more broadly on the topic. Encourage the patron to browse with you through the results for resources that look like the are going to be engaging with the qualifying aspects of their topic.
Tactic #2 - Brainstorm as many variants to their qualifier as the two of you can think of, and include all of these in the search using an OR search.
Tip #6 - Bring a librarian into the conversation sooner rather than later. Librarians have a lot of experience constructing effective searches and knowing what searches work better or worse in library tools. Even if you feel you are getting good results, it is still important to refer to a librarian as well to make sure you aren't missing anything!
Part #1 - (Questions 1-6) Imagine that you are helping a student at the desk who has said that they “can’t find anything” on their topic. When you ask them to show you how they have been searching, this is the keyword search that they show you (ie, this is what they were typing in the search box). For each example, show how you would improve their keyword search to make it more effective. What tip would you give the student to help them create better searches on their own in the future? Do try out searches in a library database to see how well they work.
Part #2 - (Questions 7-12) For each example you are given a description of a research topic/question. Take the topic and translate it into TWO possible keyword searches that you could use to locate resources. Try to use Boolean Operators and Wildcards when appropriate. I encourage you to try your searches out in HopeCat and/or a library database to see if they seem to be working well.
DUE - October 27th